Expand JFK on both the airside and landside Of the three airports, LaGuardia is the most land-constrained and lacks the facilities for international service, while JFK and Newark are better suited for expansion-which will be necessary to accommodate the anticipated overall growth in air travel, and to absorb both the many commercial flights from LaGuardia and those displaced by the closing of Teterboro. But the only thing that would significantly increase capacity at these major airports is building new runways. Many improvements could help reduce delays and handle additional passengers at JFK, Newark, and LaGuardia, including implementing new air traffic control technology, improving intercity rail service, and expanding service at other airports in the region. Teterboro Airport, currently the airport of choice for general aviation flights (primarily corporate business flights), will likely need to close later this century due to the risk of rising sea levels. Even with the success of AirTrain at JFK and Newark, transit access to the airports is not optimal, and traffic congestion on nearby roads and highways makes flying even more uncertain and time-consuming.Ĭlimate change poses an additional challenge to our airports. The customer experience-from access to the airport to amenities inside the terminals-is also uneven and subpar when compared with international peers. Unfortunately, expanding any of these airports presents major environmental challenges for adjacent communities and natural ecosystems. And while air passenger travel demand could increase 60 percent in 2040 (and double by 2060), it is obvious that our airports will not be able to meet that demand and keep us competitive on the global scale. Today, our three major airports rank first, third, and fourth for worst delays in the nation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |